Does not match the split
What you might hearI split 7 into 4 and 4.
Splits into wrong numbers that do not add to the total.
Chooses split carelessly.
This one responds to correction in the moment — the idea is there, the rule being applied is not.
There are 3 recognisable ways a child goes wrong here — distinct patterns, not carelessness.
Each one below is a mistake our question bank was built to expose, written out the way you would actually hear it said out loud at home.
Knowing which one you are looking at is the whole job. "Check your answer" does not help a child who is confidently applying the wrong rule.
What you might hearI split 7 into 4 and 4.
Splits into wrong numbers that do not add to the total.
Chooses split carelessly.
This one responds to correction in the moment — the idea is there, the rule being applied is not.
What you might hear6 times (5 + 2)? That's 6 times 5, so 30.
Splits the side but multiplies only one piece, forgetting the second small rectangle.
The child sees the first sub-rectangle and stops, not realizing both parts together make the whole area.
Words rarely shift this one. It needs something to look at — a picture, a fold, an object on the table — before the explanation lands.
What you might hearI found both rectangles, 30 and 12, so now I just times them together to get the big answer.
For 6 x (5 + 2), the child splits the rectangle correctly into a 6 x 5 piece and a 6 x 2 piece, finds the two sub-areas right (6 x 5 = 30 and 6 x 2 = 12), but then MULTIPLIES the pieces: 30 x 12 = 360. The correct total is 30 + 12 = 42, so the answer is far too big.
The child has just used multiplication to find each rectangle's area, so they keep multiplying out of habit and assume the two pieces 'combine' the same way. They miss that putting two areas side by side joins them, which means you ADD the parts to get the whole.
Words rarely shift this one. It needs something to look at — a picture, a fold, an object on the table — before the explanation lands.
For each mistake above, Algo School gives you the words to say next — the specific response that corrects the thinking instead of just marking the answer wrong, plus practice aimed at that exact error.
See your child's own results — start freeYuki draws an area model showing 4 × 2 side by side with 4 × 3 to illustrate the distributive property. What is the combined area?
Answer 20.0
Generated by area-3, a deterministic question engine — not written by an AI, and verified before any child sees it.
Look at what they SAY, not just what they wrote. Each mistake above includes the phrasing a parent typically hears — that sentence is usually the giveaway. In Algo School, the tutor recognises these patterns while your child is working and adapts the session around the one it sees.
Yes. We track 3 distinct approved mistake patterns for this concept, each one written up because it recurs — not because it is unusual. A child making one of them is doing something systematic, which is far easier to fix than random errors.
Respond to the thinking, not the answer. Algo School gives parents the specific wording for each mistake, then generates practice targeted at that error and shows you whether it actually cleared.
They are part of the same content library that drives practice: each one is reviewed and approved before it is used, and the Measurement and Data questions on this site are checked by an automated verification pass before a child is ever served them.
See the full curriculum map — every Common Core concept we cover, the verified question count, and what a child at this level should know.
Free for 15 days — a card is kept on file, but $0 is charged until the trial ends. Cancel in one click before then and pay nothing.
See your child's own results — start free